• Contact
• About APA
• Site Map

• Psychiatric Practice
  • Addiction Psychiatry
  • Ethics
  • Managing Your Practice
  • Medicare Medicaid
  • Practice Guidelines
  • Quality Improvement
• Education & Career Development
  • Educational Initiatives
  • Lifelong Learning & CME
  • Medical Students
  • Meetings
  • Melvin Sabshin Library & Archives
  • Residents
• Research
  • DSM
  • International Programs
  • Psychiatric Research Report
  • Health Policy Analysis
  • APIRE
  • Practice Research Network and Health Services Research
  • Research Training and Funding
  • Research in Residency
  • Research Colloquium for Junior Investigators
  • Endowment Campaign
• Advocacy
  • APA AMA Delegation
  • Communications & Public Affairs
  • Financing Health Care
  • Government Relations
  • Multimedia
  • Political Action Committee
• Newsroom
  • News Releases
  • Annual Reports
  • APA Member and DB/SA Resources
  • APA Daily Bulletin
• Members Corner

• Home
• Psychiatric Practice
• Quality Improvement
• Performance Measures
• Introduction

Introduction

In both the public and private healthcare sectors, there is a push to encourage the use of performance measures as a means of improving healthcare quality, which has been found to be lacking by several high profile reports such as the Institute of Medicine’s To Err is Human (2000); Crossing the Quality Chasm (2001); and Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions (2006). A clinical performance measure delimits an aspect of clinical care such as patient outcome, patient experience of care, or clinical process (adherence to evidence-based guidelines specific activities such as diagnosis, assessment, and treatment). Physician-level performance measures are incorporating into healthcare in a number of ways, including: physician-initiated practice review and quality improvement; financial incentives from healthcare payers tied to performance (i.e. pay-for-performance or P4P); board certification; and, public recognition of physicians based on performance. Several concerns about performance measurement have been raised. Field testing of measure validity and reliability is not always thorough. Evidence that performance measurement improves quality care is still limited. Overlapping, redundant measures from multiple initiatives may introduce extra administrative burden for clinicians and their staff. It is important that Psychiatry remain abreast of and involved in performance measure activities to ensure that these efforts are clinically sound and reflect the values of the field.

Given the current emphasis on performance measures, it is important that APA members are knowledgeable and actively involved to ensure that measures reflect the values of psychiatry. APA entities such as the Committee on Quality Indicators, the Council on Quality Care, the Department of Quality Improvement and Psychiatric Services (QIPS), Department of Government Relations (DGR), and Department of Healthcare Systems and Financing (HSF) will continue to collaboratively monitor and participate in national performance measure initiatives; explore performance measure development and implementation support within the APA; and work with experts such as those involved with Practice Guideline development to ensure that performance measures developed by outside groups are evidence-based and practical.